Subject: Re: [xsl] \ From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:48:05 GMT |
No, http://example.com/\data\file.xsl/../foo.xsl That is _not_ how the URI RFC defines how a relative URI is made given a base URI of x and a relative URI of Y you do not make x/../y you _have_ to remove from x any characters after the last / and then append y. If the current URI is http://example.com/\data\file.xsl and a local URI is foo.xsl then it is the _client_ that has to put these together and make an absolute uri to get from the server, the client doesn't know what kind of machine the server is it just follows the uri spec and that is absolutely clear, the absolute uri corresponding to the relative uri is http://example.com/foo.xsl David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] \, David Tolpin | Thread | Re: [xsl] \, David Tolpin |
Re: [xsl] XSL/HTML styling and CSS , David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL/HTML styling and CSS , David Carlisle |
Month |