Re: [xsl] \

Subject: Re: [xsl] \
From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:09:16 +0400 (AMT)
> That is _not_ how the URI RFC defines how a relative URI is made

Yes, David,

thank you for pointing it out. I've read the URI RFC and have found out
that the recommended procedure to make relative URIs is not what i thought
it was (this is normal with me, unfortunately).

But then my question about SAXON (in a separate message). Do I misunderstand
something again or is the behaviour is non-conformant? I am asking because
I am implementing URL handling for my program (not XSLT processor) and am trying
to put it right. I hoped I could use the existing code as a sample.


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread