Re: [xsl] Parametrized includes -work-around?

[Ralph Holz <ralph.holz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

David,

David Carlisle wrote:

>   Doing a two-step transformation seems easier at this points. We consider
>   doing the first part (constructing the stylesheet that performs the
>   actual transformation) as part of the strutscx action.
>
>
> That's odd because having  generated a stylesheet on teh fly you then
> have to use that as the main transformation stylesheet, ie exactly the
> thing you said was hard to do.

My mistake, I misled you there.

My point is this: we're going to have more than one dynamic include,
i.e. the main stylesheet B would need to include, say, two  more
templates (C and D) dynamically (in addition to A which is always
included as a module).

Following your suggestions, we would write a strutscx action that
combines C and D, then include B (and A). 'The XSLT way'.

But I fail to to see the difference to doing it this way: write a
strutscx action that takes B (and A), and inserts C and D. Does the same
thing, only maybe not the 'XSLT way'.

Actually, is there a written requirement that states how dynamic
includes should be handled the XSLT way?

Cheers,
Ralph