Subject: Re: [xsl] Parametrized includes -work-around? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:17:21 +0100 |
Doing a two-step transformation seems easier at this points. We consider doing the first part (constructing the stylesheet that performs the actual transformation) as part of the strutscx action. That's odd because having generated a stylesheet on teh fly you then have to use that as the main transformation stylesheet, ie exactly the thing you said was hard to do. Incidentally an alternative is to just always include all the stylesheets (making sure that the templates in your optional stylesheets all have a mode attribute then you can dynamically select which mode to use as in <xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:choose> <xsl;when> <xsl:apply-templates mode="a"/> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:apply-templates mode="b"/> ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Parametrized includes -wo, Ralph Holz | Thread | Re: [xsl] Parametrized includes -wo, Ralph Holz |
Re: [xsl] SelectingSubsetsOfNode-Se, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Merging Data, Kevin Bird (Matrix) |
Month |