Re: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness

Subject: Re: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:36:35 -0400

On Aug 17, 2004, at 6:47 PM, Michael Kay wrote:

In fact if Saxon delayed the decision to generate the xmlns="" undeclaration until after namespace fixup, it could reassign the default ("") prefix, and generate a more pleasing output tree. But it doesn't.

So is this purely an aesthetic issue? It has no effect on subsequent processing?

Bruce

Current Thread
[xsl] namespace prefix weirdness, (continued) Bruce D'Arcus - Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:43:31 -0400 Jeni Tennison - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:19:30 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:33:37 -0400 Michael Kay - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:47:16 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:36:35 -0400 <= Michael Kay - Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:35:19 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:02:27 -0400 Michael Kay - Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:21:48 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:07:40 -0400

Current Thread

[xsl] namespace prefix weirdness, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdnes, Michael Kay	Thread	RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdnes, Michael Kay
RE: [xsl] Traverse XML Source, Karl J. Stubsjoen	Date	RE: [xsl] Traverse XML Source, Mukul Gandhi
	Month