Re: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Subject: Re: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:07:40 -0400

On Aug 19, 2004, at 3:21 AM, Michael Kay wrote:

If there are then processing implications, it seems to me that with
Jeni's simple stylesheet, Saxon ought to generate ...


I'm not sure I understand "ought". As far as conformance to the spec is
concerned, I don't think this is either a "must" or a "should".

If the spec allows this, and since 2.0 is not final, then perhaps it "ought" to be changed? Just a thought ...

Bruce

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness, (continued) Bruce D'Arcus - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:36:35 -0400 Michael Kay - Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:35:19 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:02:27 -0400 Michael Kay - Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:21:48 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:07:40 -0400 <= Michael Kay - Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:59:56 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:57:49 -0400 Jeni Tennison - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:26:16 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:01:51 -0400

Current Thread

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdnes, Michael Kay	Thread	RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdnes, Michael Kay
[xsl] Naming styles, xptm	Date	RE: [xsl] Naming styles, Andrew Welch
	Month