RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness

Subject: RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:59:56 +0100

> If the spec allows this, and since 2.0 is not final, then perhaps it 
> "ought" to be changed?   Just a thought ...

The spec quite deliberately doesn't mandate the algorithm that processors
should use for generating namespace prefixes. The algorithms that today's
products use are almost certainly better than any algorithm the spec-writers
could have dreamt up, because they benefit from continuous feedback, like
the example you have just provided.

Michael Kay

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness, (continued) Michael Kay - Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:35:19 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:02:27 -0400 Michael Kay - Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:21:48 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:07:40 -0400 Michael Kay - Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:59:56 +0100 <= Bruce D'Arcus - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:57:49 -0400 Jeni Tennison - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:26:16 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:01:51 -0400 Bruce D'Arcus - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:01:56 -0400

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdness, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] namespace prefix weirdnes, Bruce D'Arcus	Thread	Re: [xsl] modes and temp trees (was, Bruce D'Arcus
RE: [xsl] CrimsonParser, Michael Kay	Date	[xsl] Need help - Getting the value, Mario Grech
	Month