Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?

Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:17:08 -0400

On Oct 2, 2004, at 2:55 PM, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:

Btw, as a matter of interest, I recently started another open source XSLT 2.0 project - XQP (http://sourceforge.net/projects/xqp). The goal is to develop free XPath 2.0, XQuery 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 processor for the ..NET platform. The project is on a very early stage, we are gathering team and making some preliminary setup and design. Those interested to participate - welcome.

This sounds interesting, but does this mean Mono also? I'm not really clear on the relationship between .NET and Mono.

Bruce

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued) M. David Peterson - Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:57:38 -0700 Marcus Andersson - Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:47:52 +0200 Colin Paul Adams - 03 Oct 2004 06:16:48 +0100 M. David Peterson - Sun, 03 Oct 2004 01:35:41 -0700 Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:17:08 -0400 <= Colin Paul Adams - 07 Oct 2004 15:35:09 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:44:09 -0400 Colin Paul Adams - 07 Oct 2004 15:43:53 +0100 Oleg Tkachenko - Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:24:09 +0200

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, M. David Peterson	Thread	Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Colin Paul Adams
Re: [xsl] Re: [xslt transform & gro, Michael PG	Date	[xsl] call-template with parameteri, Vidar Ramdal
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home