Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?

Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 07 Oct 2004 15:43:53 +0100

>>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Bruce> On Oct 7, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:

    >> My own xslt 2.0 processor should compile to the .NET platform
    >> as well as various native architectures, and so should also run
    >> on Mono,

    Bruce> So what are you writing it in?  I would have guessed C#,
    Bruce> but the reference to "compile to ... various native
    Bruce> architectures" leaves me unsure.

Eiffel.
-- 
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued) M. David Peterson - Sun, 03 Oct 2004 01:35:41 -0700 Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:17:08 -0400 Colin Paul Adams - 07 Oct 2004 15:35:09 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:44:09 -0400 Colin Paul Adams - 07 Oct 2004 15:43:53 +0100 <= Oleg Tkachenko - Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:24:09 +0200 Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:21:05 -0400 Oleg Tkachenko - Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:30:37 +0200 Marty McKeever - Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:17:00 -0400

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Bruce D'Arcus	Thread	Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Oleg Tkachenko
Re: [xsl] Re: [xslt transform & gro, Anton Triest	Date	Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Bruce D'Arcus
	Month