Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:

Btw, as a matter of interest, I recently started another open source XSLT 2.0 project - XQP (http://sourceforge.net/projects/xqp). The goal is to develop free XPath 2.0, XQuery 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 processor for the ..NET platform. The project is on a very early stage, we are gathering team and making some preliminary setup and design. Those interested to participate - welcome.

This sounds interesting, but does this mean Mono also?

Sure.

I'm not really clear on the relationship between .NET and Mono.

Mono (core of it) is an implementation of ECMA C# and ECMA CLI, just like Microsoft .NET actually is. Any pure CLI code (read - not using Microsoft or Mono specific classes) can be run on .NET, Mono or dotGNU.

--
Oleg Tkachenko
http://blog.tkachenko.com
Multiconn Technologies, Israel

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued) Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:17:08 -0400 Colin Paul Adams - 07 Oct 2004 15:35:09 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:44:09 -0400 Colin Paul Adams - 07 Oct 2004 15:43:53 +0100 Oleg Tkachenko - Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:24:09 +0200 <= Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:21:05 -0400 Oleg Tkachenko - Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:30:37 +0200 Marty McKeever - Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:17:00 -0400 Marcus Andersson - Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:45:14 +0200

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Colin Paul Adams	Thread	Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Bruce D'Arcus
Re: [xsl] Namespace Problem, Oleg Tkachenko	Date	RE: [xsl] Namespace Problem, Bommineni, Venkatesh
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home