Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?

Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:21:05 -0400

On Oct 7, 2004, at 4:24 PM, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:

Mono (core of it) is an implementation of ECMA C# and ECMA CLI, just like Microsoft .NET actually is. Any pure CLI code (read - not using Microsoft or Mono specific classes) can be run on .NET, Mono or dotGNU.

OK, good.

So that means XQP will be such a project? I got confused because you wrote ".NET platform"; but it sounds like you're just intending to write a processor in C#?

Bruce

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued) Colin Paul Adams - 07 Oct 2004 15:35:09 +0100 Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:44:09 -0400 Colin Paul Adams - 07 Oct 2004 15:43:53 +0100 Oleg Tkachenko - Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:24:09 +0200 Bruce D'Arcus - Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:21:05 -0400 <= Oleg Tkachenko - Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:30:37 +0200 Marty McKeever - Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:17:00 -0400 Marcus Andersson - Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:45:14 +0200 Pieter Reint Siegers Kort - Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:18:25 -0500

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued)
- Pieter Reint Siegers Kort - Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:18:25 -0500

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Oleg Tkachenko	Thread	Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Oleg Tkachenko
Re: [xsl] Namespace Problem, Oleg Tkachenko	Date	[xsl] trasformation of a Word Docum, marinabortolotti\@li
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home