|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default From: JBryant@xxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:39:59 -0600 |
I've been using XSLT 2.0 and the various versions of Saxon 8 since July of
2004. I've had very little trouble with either. Dr. Kay fixed the one bug
I found in Saxon 8 within a day (and I had already thought of a
work-around).
I can see two issues. First, you'll tie yourself to a single vendor.
That's not much of an issue, since you would probably pick a single vendor
anyway and since Saxonica is a fine vendor. Second, the 2.0 specification
may change before it is finalized. However, that risk seems to be low, as
the working group is winding down (so I gather anyway).
I have been solving problems for my clients without undue difficulty (and
often much more easily than I could with XSLT 1) for 8 months now. Based
on my experience, I recommend that you go with Saxon 8 and XSLT 2.0.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
Daniel O'Donnell <daniel.odonnell@xxxxxxxx>
03/08/2005 12:26 PM
Please respond to
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default
Hi,
I have a question that calls for informed opinion: is
there a reason
for not using xslt 2.0 for most processing tasks? I'm thinking
especially privatish, and pre-processed things rather than on-the-fly
commercial applications.
The standard is now pretty stable, correct? and the
processors seems to
be working well. Saxon 8b-3 is very good, and since Saxon 6.5.3 has a
bug that seems to stop it writing properly in Service pack two XP
machines, it may be a good time to switch anyway.
No doubt a trivial question, but I'd be interested in
hearing what
people think. I'm engaged in a couple of new project involving xslt
where the question of 1.0 or 2.0 is real.
-dan
--
Daniel Paul O'Donnell, PhD
Associate Professor of English
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4
Tel. (403) 329-2377
Fax. (403) 382-7191
E-mail <daniel.odonnell@xxxxxxxx>
Home Page <http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/>
The Digital Medievalist Project: <http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/>
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Is there a reason for not usi, Daniel O'Donnell | Thread | Re: [xsl] Is there a reason for not, Elliotte Harold |
| [xsl] RE: Operational system date, Daniel O'Donnell | Date | Re: [xsl] Is there a reason for not, Elliotte Harold |
| Month |