Subject: Re: [xsl] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default|
From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:03:25 -0500
I can see two issues. First, you'll tie yourself to a single vendor. That's not much of an issue, since you would probably pick a single vendor anyway and since Saxonica is a fine vendor. Second, the 2.0 specification may change before it is finalized. However, that risk seems to be low, as the working group is winding down (so I gather anyway).
-- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim