| Subject: Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl:sort From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:37:38 +0100 | 
<xsl:apply-templates select="B">
  <xsl:sort select="B" order="ascending"/>
B doesn't have B children so the sort key is the empty set and so no
sort will occur.
<xsl:template match="B">
  <xsl:if test="not(position()=last())">
Because there is no sorting then on the last B node
    <xsl:variable name="nextB" select="number(following-sibling::B)"/>
following-sibling::B is empty so number is not-a-number (NaN)
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] following-sibling and xsl:sor, Karl Stubsjoen | Thread | RE: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, Michael Kay | 
| [xsl] I'm obviously doing something, Deirdre Saoirse Moen | Date | Re: [xsl] I'm obviously doing somet, Bruce D'Arcus | 
| Month |