Subject: RE: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl:sort From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:08:19 +0100 |
> I am having troubles with following-sibling and wondering if I am > doing something wrong. I'm expecting that the following-sibling will > result in the next (sorted) element, but it appears that it is not. Two nodes are siblings if they are children of the same parent node. When nodes are sorted, they do not change their parent, so they don't change their siblings either. Nodes can participate in many sequences, but only in one tree, and the axes always reflect their position in the tree, not their position in a particular sequence. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, Karl Stubsjoen |
Re: [xsl] I'm obviously doing somet, JBryant | Date | Re: [xsl] I'm obviously doing somet, Deirdre Saoirse Moen |
Month |