| Subject: Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl:sort From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:21:26 +1000 | 
On 4/28/05, Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is the obvious (and only) solution to use xxx:node-set against
> transformed / sorted XML?
The answer follows from the fact that XSLT is Turing-complete.
Therefore, any problem, which has solution using the xxx:node-set()
extension function should have a solution without using it.
In the case of grouping and then sorting, one such pure XSLT 1.0
solution can be found at:
       http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200311/msg00659.html
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, Karl Stubsjoen | Thread | Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, Karl Stubsjoen | 
| [xsl] Cannot have a DOCTYPE declara, mad rat | Date | RE: [xsl] apply-templates and predi, tom tom | 
| Month |