Subject: RE: [xsl] test if null From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:13:03 +0100 |
> Also, an aside -- I'm sure there's a reason why some people prefer > "string-length(.)!=0" to "string()" (or more robustly, > "normalize-space()") > -- but I've never been able to guess what it could be. Slight unease, I think, at relying on implicit type conversion. It feels a bit sneaky, like using 0 to mean false in C. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] test if null, Wendell Piez | Thread | RE: [xsl] test if null, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Complicated grouping and , David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] single document write, Michael Kay |
Month |