RE: [xsl] test if null

[Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 06:13 PM 6/29/2005, Mike wrote:
> > Also, an aside -- I'm sure there's a reason why some people prefer
> > "string-length(.)!=0" to "string()" (or more robustly,
> > "normalize-space()")
> > -- but I've never been able to guess what it could be.
>
> Slight unease, I think, at relying on implicit type conversion. It feels a
> bit sneaky, like using 0 to mean false in C.

Yes, funny that. I admit I also like the sneakiness of "0" for false. :-> 
(And of course the string-length solution does a type-conversion too.)

Cheers,
Wendell


======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================