|
Subject: RE: [xsl] concat all items in a sequence From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:34:18 +0100 |
> I'm using the following:
>
> contains(elem, val)
>
> It's possible that 'elem' can be a sequence of more than one item.
>
> The way I've code around this is to use string-join with an empty
> string as one of the arguments:
>
> contains(string-join(for $i in elem return $i, ''), val)
>
> Is there a better way?
1. The expression
for $i in elem return $i
can be rewritten as
elem
So you get
contains(string-join(elem, ''), val)
2. Do you want to match substrings that cross item boundaries, e.g. do you
want contains(('red', 'green'), 'edgr') to be true? If so, I don't think you
can do better than the above. If you don't want this, then apply contains to
each string in the sequence separately:
exists(elem[contains(., val)])
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] concat all items in a sequenc, andrew welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] concat all items in a seq, andrew welch |
| [xsl] Using a variable as part of t, Khorasani, Houman | Date | RE: [xsl] Using a variable as part , cknell |
| Month |