Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule?
From: "Joris Gillis" <roac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:36:08 +0200
Tempore 15:20:04, die 09/21/2005 AD, hinc in xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx scripsit David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>:

I'd say FALSE, because it cannot handle this XML document properly:

it can so:-)

The result of the transformation is:

<!-- foo -->

This is not even well-formed XML anymore. How can you still call it an identity transformation, when it gives this behaviour?

Joris Gillis (
Don't send spam. I don't like it and it is illegal.

Current Thread