Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:02:31 +0100
> How can you still call it an identity transformation, when it gives
> this behaviour?

well clearly I could, since I did:-)

I was reading what Dimitre intended not what he wrote (that's usually
best when reading my posts as well). As George just pointed out, there is
a / missing in the match.


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:

Current Thread