Subject: Re: [xsl] Why no namespace node KindTest? From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:44:39 +0200 (CEST) |
Michael Kay wrote: > Yes, at the time these decisions were being made this was > one of the proposals on the table. Thanks for all your precisions. > IIRC, one of the arguments against it was that XSLT > couldn't cope with "parentless" nodes ;-) Regards, --drkm p5.vert.ukl.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Aug 25 12:13:42 GMT 2006 ___________________________________________________________________________ Dicouvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Riponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expiriences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Why no namespace node Kin, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Why no namespace node Kin, Frans Englich |
RE: [xsl] Why no namespace node Kin, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Using translate() for sin, Oleg Konovalov |
Month |