Re: [xsl] Why no namespace node KindTest?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Why no namespace node KindTest?
From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:23:25 +0000

On Saturday 26 August 2006 22:14, Michael Kay wrote:
[...]

> One of the things I learnt from James was that
> when someone argues against a specification on the grounds that it is
> impossible to implement efficiently, they are usually wrong.

Could you elaborate? E.g, why is implementation efficiency, usually, not a 
valid reason?


Cheers,

		Frans

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Why no namespace node KindTest?, (continued) Michael Kay - Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:38:17 +0100 Florent Georges - Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:04:30 +0200 (CEST) Michael Kay - Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:14:08 +0100 Florent Georges - Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:44:39 +0200 (CEST) Frans Englich - Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:23:25 +0000 <= Michael Kay - Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:01:31 +0100 Florent Georges - Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:43:13 +0200 (CEST) Michael Kay - Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:29:21 +0100 Florent Georges - Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:50:57 +0200 (CEST)

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] Why no namespace node KindTest?, (continued)
- Michael Kay - Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:29:21 +0100
  - Florent Georges - Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:50:57 +0200 (CEST)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Why no namespace node Kin, Florent Georges	Thread	RE: [xsl] Why no namespace node Kin, Michael Kay
RE: [xsl] Why no namespace node Kin, Michael Kay	Date	Re: [xsl] Sort before paging, Giancarlo Rossi
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home