Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived

On 1/23/07, Elliotte Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Using Saxon just requires setting saxon8.jar in the classpath. Xalan-J
> requires setting xalan.jar. So complexity of using Saxon is same as
> Xalan.

Yes, and both are quite a bit more complex than using xsltproc. :-(
Classpath is evil.

Are you talking on behalf of the masses there or for yourself?

It's a bit strange that a java expert (advertising their latest java
book in their email sig) thinks that running a java program is hard...

Have you tried Kernow? - it's a point and click front end for Saxon,
intended for anyone who dislikes the command line.  (although its a
java program, too)

http://sourceforge.net/projects/kernowforsaxon/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 in the browser, (continued) bryan rasmussen - Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:10:23 +0100 Houghton,Andrew - Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:16:33 -0500 bryan rasmussen - Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:44:24 +0100 Mukul Gandhi - Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:42:01 +0530 Andrew Welch - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:34:52 +0000 <= Andrew Welch - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:41:17 +0000 Abel Braaksma - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:48:35 +0100 David Carlisle - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:57:26 GMT Andrew Welch - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:59:10 +0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 in the browser, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Mukul Gandhi	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Andrew Welch
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Abel Braaksma	Date	Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, David Carlisle
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home