Subject: more on XSLT processor performance From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:55:51 +0100 (BST) |
People who like these things may like to re-examine http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rahtz/xsltest/Report.html, as I have redone all my tests. I added Transformiix into the set, and the sieve of erathosthenes, and also ran my largest data file (4227978 elements). I have run the tests with MSXML3, but the computer's clock was broken:-} I cannot run it on the same computer as the other tests, cos MS ie5setup has left my Windows setup in an unuseable state, and I gave up after wasting 1/2 hours rebooting the machine 50 times. Anyway, the July MS thing seemed to scoot along nicely, so far as I can tell, on most of the tests. Someone with more patience than me can retry... My conclusions, again : - XT: efficient and fast, but not complete or entirely conformant - Saxon: efficient, fast and conformant (a few, a very few, bugs) - Oracle: fast, conformant, but does not scale as well as XT and Saxon *in my environment*. much greater memory use, and slows down in my memory setup with larger files. bug in ora:output - Xalan: slows down (or dies) considerably on larger jobs, but delivers the goods otherwise. - Sablotron: incomplete (work in progress), and gets locked in bigger jobs for ever, but looking promising - Transformiix: has a good go, but cannot cope with larger files - MSXML3 (July): looking good, but not there yet For my type of work, in my computer setup, Saxon wins pretty easily. Others will have different criteria to choose from what is really a very rich field of contenders. Sebastian Rahtz XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: java out of memory, Eduardo Gutentag | Thread | RE: more on XSLT processor performa, Matthew Bentley |
RE: Saxon VS XT, Linda van den Brink | Date | Relative URLs & XSLT, Meukens, Kris |
Month |