RE: more on XSLT processor performance

Subject: RE: more on XSLT processor performance
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:21:25 +0100
> I agree. Saxon, at the current point in time, seems to be the winner.
> However, I'd like to see more compiled XSLT processors than Java ones.
> 5.5 hours to process a 69 MB file is not practical -

Compiling won't solve the memory problem. If we're going to make XSLT
processing of such large files practical, the only way we'll do it is by
using persistent storage rather than memory for the tree.

Mike Kay

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread