RE: more on XSLT processor performance

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: more on XSLT processor performance

Subject: RE: more on XSLT processor performance
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:21:25 +0100

> I agree. Saxon, at the current point in time, seems to be the winner.
> However, I'd like to see more compiled XSLT processors than Java ones.
> 5.5 hours to process a 69 MB file is not practical -

Compiling won't solve the memory problem. If we're going to make XSLT
processing of such large files practical, the only way we'll do it is by
using persistent storage rather than memory for the tree.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
more on XSLT processor performance Sebastian Rahtz - Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:55:51 +0100 (BST) <Possible follow-ups> Matthew Bentley - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:39:58 +1200 Sebastian Rahtz - Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:45:29 +0100 (BST) Matt Sergeant - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:34:11 +0100 (BST) Kay Michael - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:21:25 +0100 <= Paulo Gaspar - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:21:29 +0200 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 11:22:03 +0200 Kay Michael - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 11:47:51 +0100

Current Thread

more on XSLT processor performance
- Sebastian Rahtz - Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:55:51 +0100 (BST)
  - <Possible follow-ups>
  - Matthew Bentley - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:39:58 +1200
    - Sebastian Rahtz - Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:45:29 +0100 (BST)
      - Matt Sergeant - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:34:11 +0100 (BST)
  - Kay Michael - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:21:25 +0100 <=
    - Paulo Gaspar - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:21:29 +0200
  - Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 11:22:03 +0200
  - Kay Michael - Wed, 2 Aug 2000 11:47:51 +0100

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: more on XSLT processor performa, Matt Sergeant	Thread	RE: more on XSLT processor performa, Paulo Gaspar
RE: FO, Kay Michael	Date	Re: xslt strings: 'substring-betwee, Oliver Becker
	Month