Subject: [xsl] Re: [meta] why post? [was] CSS From: "Mike Haarman" <mhaarman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:13:47 -0500 |
From: "Mike Brown" <mike@xxxxxxxx> > point. It seemed like an innocuous suggestion, to me, since even if I had not > correctly guessed what the original poster meant, making the suggestion > to use xsl:comment to generate comments was sure to benefit *somebody*. Precisely. > It's becoming an increasingly rare event when I feel like helping anyone on > this list anymore. That is unfortunate. > I concluded that > the person doesn't deserve the assistance. Whether or not the rubes, a&&hats and wankers that pollute any list deserve assistance, there is a great, polite, silent majority that appreciate every tidbit of insight that appears in a forum like this. I've found your contributions quite valuable, Mike. Everybody's got a nit to pick, some of us are more neurotic than others, but we're all here to learn. Mike XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] CSS, Mike Brown | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: [meta] why post? [was, David Carlisle |
[xsl] comparing nodes by name, Stephan Kahnt | Date | Re: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first., David Carlisle |
Month |