Subject: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?|
From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:53:50 +0200
As for Gestalt versus xsltproc [...] Xsltproc will run faster, but is non-compliant to the XSLT 1.0 recommendation. -- http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/200701/post40510.html
[...] when I still used XSLT [1.0, M. L.], I would use xsltproc for my processor, due to its famed speed (I wasn't aware of its non-compliance at the time) [...] -- http://colina.demon.co.uk/?q=node/20
What exactly does xsltproc's (that is: LibXSLT's) non-compliance (with the spec, I guess) consist in? And is there a standard test suite of XSLT programs to determine a processor's compliance?
The other day I noticed that for a particular case, xsltproc produces a different result than its fellow processors. Has this difference been determined in more general terms?