Subject: Re: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance? From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:08:53 +0100 |
On 30/04/2008, Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd still be interested to know if (a) there is more to LibXSLT's > non-conformance and (b) if there is anything like a test suite in > order to determine a processor's degree of conformance. There is a test suite. I am not familiar with the XSLT 1.0 test suite though, so I can't say how well it catches non-coformance, other than to say it cannot be infallible. I am familiar with the 2.0 test suite, but this is only accessible to W3C members and invited experts.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-co, Michael Ludwig | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-co, Michael Ludwig |
Re: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-co, Michael Ludwig | Date | Re: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-co, Michael Ludwig |
Month |