RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

["Scott Trenda" <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx>]

I mean a language, to be used on the server side on web servers, that
can talk to the database, the file system, and other protocols, and
dynamically assemble an HTML or XML view of a requested page to be
delivered to the client. "Bad" or not, this is a reality that nearly
EVERY web developer has to deal with frequently, and my question still
stands. :)

Also, I don't claim to know why you think preprocessors are "just bad",
but just because many of the current implementations are ugly doesn't
make the idea flawed.

~ Scott


-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Paul Adams [mailto:colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:16 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> writes:

    Scott> My reply is getting a little off-topic, but on the same
    Scott> note, why haven't we seen a widely-used XML-based HTML
    Scott> preprocessor language yet?

Pre-processors are just bad. (If you mean macro processors, that
is. If you mean transformation languages, such as XSLT, then you have
the answer to your own question.)
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire