Subject: Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each ? From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 04:25:58 -0800 (PST) |
Mukul Gandhi wrote: Hi, > I guess, xsl:call-template is retained in XSLT 2.0 due to > backward compatibility with XSLT 1. Named templates and functions are not the same beasts. The first difference that come to my mind is that the sequence ctor of a function is always evaluated in temporary output state. But true, for some usages (a lot of usage, for a right definition of "a lot") a function can be used instead of a named template. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Mukul Gandhi | Date | Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Mukul Gandhi |
Month |