Subject: Re: [stella] some more optimization tips From: emooney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Erik Mooney) Date: Sat, 09 May 1998 02:26:40 GMT |
>> I can't figure a 2 byte non-destructive 5 cycle delay :( >> >> Of course, a destructive one is easy >> >> INC $80 I missed this variant before: You should be able to do INC $30 for a two-byte five-cycle non-destructive delay. $30 isn't used by the TIA as a write register; as a read register, it returns the same data as address $00, which is just a collision register and reading it does no harm. As long as you're not using a cart that does bankswitching on that address, it should work. (this is obviously 2600-specific and not 6502-generic, which most of the others were) -- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] some more optimization, Jim Nitchals | Thread | Re: [stella] some more optimization, Andrew Davie |
Re: [stella] Six-sprite slot machin, Greg Troutman | Date | Re: [stella] Six-sprite slot machin, Eric Fischer |
Month |