Subject: Re: [stella] my "pot" runneth over From: gentlben@xxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 21:59:20 -0700 |
> All the way counterclockwise should be very low resistance and therefore > the capacitors would recharge immediately. All the way clockwise, it's > actually quite long. I tested this a while back, don't remember the exact > number but it was on the order of 1.5 frames (400-something scanlines.) ouch...that means i have to update the counter every other frame for a 1/30 second reaction time...:/ > Definitely. It's almost always worth extra bytes to get more screen > action going on the 2600. whew...then i didnt use up all the space for nothing when i wrote the darn routine today :) dee -- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] my "pot" runneth over, Erik Mooney | Thread | Re: [stella] my "pot" runneth over, Eckhard Stolberg |
Re: [stella] my "pot" runneth over, Erik Mooney | Date | Re: [stella] my "pot" runneth over, Eckhard Stolberg |
Month |