RE: Evolving strategies,

Subject: RE: Evolving strategies,
From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 14:27:19 +0100 (BST)
--text follows this line--
 > I like the sgml-sgml transform,
 > I can use Omnimark, sgmlc etc,
 > (and it may be a little easier than DSSSL) but
 > it is not an ISO standard, I must invest in a commercial
 > tool with all the pitfalls.
 > My choice would always be to use tools which implement
 > a standard.
 > Definately not a sideshow IMHO.
but the extensions in Jade which let you use it for SGML to SGML
transformation are NOT implenting an ISO standard. other DSSSL engines
are unlikely to allow them. caveat emptor!

sebastian

 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread