Subject: Re: DD: DTD for authoring. From: Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 13:59:03 -0500 (EST) |
At 21 Jan 1998 13:35 -0500, Paul Prescod wrote: > Ben Trafford wrote: > > > > In respect to the current discussion about using HTML or DocBook, etc. > > for the authoring of the DD segments, my vote is that we either adopt > > DocBook or have somebody bang out a DTD specific to this project. I > > can't see how DocBook could fail to meet our needs, but then again, I'm > > a known DocBook fanatic. ;) > > Yes, if we choose to standardize on a DTD, DocBook is the obvious > choice. We chose DocBook several months ago, and the Procedure Library and the Glossary are already in DocBook. It is my intention that the Cookbook items will be converted to DocBook, but I haven't got to it yet. (Are there any takers for a comparatively simple conversion job?) Regards, Tony Graham ======================================================================= Tony Graham Mulberry Technologies, Inc. Phone: 301-315-9632 17 West Jefferson Street, Suite 207 Fax: 301-315-8285 Rockville, MD USA 20850 email: tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ======================================================================= DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: DD: DTD for authoring., Paul Prescod | Thread | converting SGML DTDs was Re: DD: DT, Christian Leutloff |
DD: Standardized DTD (Was "Re: DSSS, Tony Graham | Date | Formatting "(Continued on next page, Frank A. Christoph |
Month |