Subject: Re: PostScript? From: Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 12:01:48 -0400 (EDT) |
At 27 Aug 1998 01:24 -0400, Adam P. Harris wrote: ... > Lets hope so. Here's a bug report of noted problems. Sebastian, let > me know if a later revision is likely to fix these problems. Let me > know if you would like a sample document demonstrating the problems. ... > * doesn't have reasonable headers/footers out of the box, might be > fixable w/ more research You may have come up against the limitation of what you can do with the simple-page-sequence flow object, not a limitation of JadeTeX. You are not alone, however -- we could all do with more complex header/footer formatting than is supported by simple-page-sequence. Regards, Tony Graham ====================================================================== Tony Graham mailto:tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9632 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: PostScript?, Adam P. Harris | Thread | Re: PostScript?, Russell Grigaitis |
Re: Hacking (make element) in the D, Norman Walsh | Date | ANNOUNCE: Modular DocBook Styleshee, Norman Walsh |
Month |