Subject: Re: Scheme Programming Reference From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 23 Jun 1999 18:32:53 -0400 |
Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > But since the sgml sources are online, shouldn't it be possible for us > > to come up with a stylesheet that creates a nicer-looking version ? > be wary of what you may do here, relating to copyright. you may make a > nice version, but you cannot distribute it. this is the stuffy old ISO > you are dealing with, who are in the game of making money from selling > standards, to pay their staff in their expensive Geneva offices This is incorrect. Since government funding was used in the production of the DSSSL spec, it is therefore under public domain. AFAIK, distribution of the DSSSL spec is perfectly legal. Even modification, although any modified spec should ethically carry heavy disclaimers and notices so no one confuses it for the official spec. -- .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Scheme Programming Reference, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Re: Scheme Programming Reference, Sebastian Rahtz |
RE: Background on DSSSL, Frank A. Christoph | Date | Re: DSSSL for the Java Virtual Mach, Adam Di Carlo |
Month |