Re: QuarkXpress backend for jade

[Brandon Ibach <bibach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoting Franck DELAHAYE <franck.delahaye@xxxxxxx>:
> > Why did you ask? For quality reasons or really for using the QXD lateron?
> > 
> The choice of QXP has been made because it seems to be the only tool
> that both enable editing facilities and ensures professional quality for
> post-production.
> Especially, it supports PANTONE (TM) colors and nuances, and the
> insertion of graphics made by other tools with a resolution higher than
> 2400 dps to enable good quality prints.
> It seems that there are no other tools that supports both.
> Do you think there are ?
> 
   Well, I'm not particularly familiar with FrameMaker, but wouldn't
it support these types of functionality?  It is a well regarded,
professional tool.  Can anyone who knows more about it comment?  Jade
already has a MIF backend, so this would probably be an easy solution,
if it would do what is needed.

-Brandon :)


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist