Re: transformin CALS tables

Subject: Re: transformin CALS tables
From: Jany Quintard <quintard.j@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:35:12 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Paul Tyson wrote:

> Hi Jany,
> I don't know what your idea of "simple & efficient" is, but here's a set
> of rules that processes your sample data as specified:

Simple is (for me) "easy to read and to maintain". And efficient is "not
so slow and memory consuming". Actually, as i am working in a team, I
would choose simple before efficient.
And the SGML files we process being of moderate size, this is not a
problem (not yet anyway).
My solution was not really simple, and I can't give any measurements on
its efficiency. Yours seems better.
I did not test it yet, but I am going to try soon.

Many thanks. Jany

 DSSSList info and archive:

Current Thread