(dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL

Subject: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:15:17 +0000
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:47:16PM +0100, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
> Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > arguments for the future of DSSSL are good and fine, but if they don't
> > encompass XML, they are evanescent vapours, IMHO. 
> Not in my opinion.  "XML" will not make go away my legacy encoded SGML
> texts -- I just don't need namespaces.

thats fine; all I am saying is that a modern parser needs to understand
XML and namespaces and schemas, as well as SGML and DTD.

though I'd still argue you should convert your legacy SGML....
Sebastian Rahtz      OUCS Information Manager
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist

Current Thread