Subject: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:15:17 +0000 |
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:47:16PM +0100, Karl Eichwalder wrote: > Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > arguments for the future of DSSSL are good and fine, but if they don't > > encompass XML, they are evanescent vapours, IMHO. > > Not in my opinion. "XML" will not make go away my legacy encoded SGML > texts -- I just don't need namespaces. thats fine; all I am saying is that a modern parser needs to understand XML and namespaces and schemas, as well as SGML and DTD. though I'd still argue you should convert your legacy SGML.... -- Sebastian Rahtz OUCS Information Manager 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
(dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Karl Eichwalder | Thread | Re: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Brandon Ibach |
(dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Karl Eichwalder | Date | Re: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Ian Castle |
Month |