Subject: Re: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:49:27 +0000 |
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:03:08PM -0600, Brandon Ibach wrote: > > 1) An SGML parser > > > This would be SP/OpenSP. It's just fine as it is for 99.9% of SGML > applications today, in my opinion. but its not fine for XML applications. As we move to namespaces and schemas, SP is dead in the water. arguments for the future of DSSSL are good and fine, but if they don't encompass XML, they are evanescent vapours, IMHO. -- Sebastian Rahtz OUCS Information Manager 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Brandon Ibach | Thread | (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Karl Eichwalder |
Re: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Brandon Ibach | Date | RE: (dsssl) RE: The Future of DSSSL, DPawson |
Month |