Re: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL

Subject: Re: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:49:27 +0000
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:03:08PM -0600, Brandon Ibach wrote:
> > 1) An SGML parser
> > 
>    This would be SP/OpenSP.  It's just fine as it is for 99.9% of SGML
> applications today, in my opinion.

but its not fine for XML applications. As we move to namespaces
and schemas, SP is dead in the water.

arguments for the future of DSSSL are good and fine, but if they don't
encompass XML, they are evanescent vapours, IMHO. 

Sebastian Rahtz      OUCS Information Manager
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

 DSSSList info and archive:

Current Thread