(dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL

[Karl Eichwalder <keichwa@xxxxxxx>]

Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> arguments for the future of DSSSL are good and fine, but if they don't
> encompass XML, they are evanescent vapours, IMHO. 

Not in my opinion.  "XML" will not make go away my legacy encoded SGML
texts -- I just don't need namespaces.

-- 
ke@xxxxxxx (work) / keichwa@xxxxxxx (home):              |
http://www.suse.de/~ke/                                  |      ,__o
Free Translation Project:                                |    _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/             |   (*)/'(*)

 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist