Subject: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL From: Karl Eichwalder <keichwa@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 12:47:16 +0100 |
Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > arguments for the future of DSSSL are good and fine, but if they don't > encompass XML, they are evanescent vapours, IMHO. Not in my opinion. "XML" will not make go away my legacy encoded SGML texts -- I just don't need namespaces. -- ke@xxxxxxx (work) / keichwa@xxxxxxx (home): | http://www.suse.de/~ke/ | ,__o Free Translation Project: | _-\_<, http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Sebastian Rahtz |
RE: (dsssl) RE: The Future of DSSSL, DPawson | Date | (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |