Subject: RE: (dsssl) DSSSL Documentation Project From: Javier Farreres <spanish@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:24:13 +0100 |
> As for moving it to the W3C, no way: they don't want it because they derived > XSL from it, and that's all they want. Furthermore, their credibility as a > "standards"-developing organization is declining rapidly, as evidenced by > James Clark's attacks on them in the keynote at XML 2001 and his move of his > standards activities to OASIS and back to ISO. > > Jim Mason Sorry. Could you develop more on this comments for the ones who, like me, are not aware of these attacks of James Clark to W3C as a standards developers and the reason for the criticisms? Thanks. Javier DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: (dsssl) DSSSL Documentation Pro, Mason, James David ( | Thread | RE: (dsssl) DSSSL Documentation Pro, Ian Castle |
(dsssl) Volonteering for DSSLdoc, Simon North | Date | RE: (dsssl) DSSSL Documentation Pro, Ian Castle |
Month |