Re: [jats-list] Preferred pronouns for authors

Subject: Re: [jats-list] Preferred pronouns for authors
From: "Debbie Lapeyre dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:01:52 -0000
Just read the TEI proposal. I like the idea of adding
a new element as part of the name information, this is
very different data from any we have collected before.
Of course, <author-comment> works well.

My real question is would publishers record this as
part of author information? I can see that archives might.

What say you publishers?

--Debbie

> On Dec 11, 2020, at 2:31 AM, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If you agree that all proposals brought forth so far are more or less
kludges, you might be interested in how they address it in TEIland:
https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/2010
> This is not to suggest that JATS do the same, but maybe someone can draw
inspiration from their discussion.
>
> Gerrit
>
>
>
> On 21.09.2020 15:08, Nikos Markantonatos nikos@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Thanks, Martin.
>> <suffix> would be the preferred encoding only if we consider pronouns to be
part of the official/legal name. This is because <suffix> is part of the
actual contributor name. However, since I think that this is not the case so
far for pronouns, <author-comment> is perhaps a preferable encoding.
>> Nikos
>> On 9/21/20 3:12 PM, Latterner, Martin (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
latternm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>> Just to throw another option into the mix: I think I'd just use <suffix>.
Preferred pronouns may or may not be a name part in legal/official terms.
However, just looking at how people use them, <suffix> seems the most
appropriate to me.
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Randall, Laura (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [E] laura.randall@xxxxxxx
<jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 6:47 AM
>>> To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [jats-list] Preferred pronouns for authors
>>>
>>> Hi, all.
>>> I share Nikos's concerns on the proposed solutions. I like the
<author-comment> solution best, though you'd need to add a <p> for validity.
>>>
>>> <contrib contrib-type="author">
>>>        <string-name>
>>>           <surname>Isobe</surname>
>>>           <given-names>M.</given-names>
>>>        </string-name>
>>>        <author-comment
content-type="pronouns"><p>they/them</p></author-comment>
>>> </contrib>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Laura
>>>
>>> ________________________
>>> Laura Randall (she/her)
>>> laura.randall@xxxxxxx
>>> 1-301-435-0467
>>> NCBI/NLM/NIH
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Nikos Markantonatos nikos@xxxxxxxxxx
<jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 4:58 AM
>>> To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [jats-list] Preferred pronouns for authors
>>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I feel uneasy on most suggestions made so far for the contributor pronouns
issue:
>>>
>>> 1) The name-alternatives proposal implies that the pronouns are another
alternative name for the contributor, which is far from being true
>>>
>>> 2) The named-content solution suggests that the pronouns are part of the
contributor's actual name, which is semantically not true
>>>
>>> 3) The role solution is certainly preferable than the other two, but it is
still a semantic stretch, suggesting that pronouns are a contributor role.
According to the JATS documentation, role is "title or role of a contributor
to a work", which is far from what pronouns are.
>>>
>>> At Atypon we were presented with this problem from a client two months ago
and we opted for encoding this as an author-comment, which is a child of
contrib (like role) is repeatable, takes on @content-type attribute to
designate its semantic use, takes on @xml:lang attribute to allow for multiple
languages and according to the JATS documentation "the <author-comment>
element can also act as an escape mechanism, to take the content of any
contributor-related elements not anticipated by the Suite."
>>>
>>> So here's another proposal for these pronouns:
>>>
>>> <contrib contrib-type="author">
>>>        <string-name>
>>>           <surname>Isobe</surname>
>>>           <given-names>M.</given-names>
>>>        </string-name>
>>>        <author-comment content-type="pronouns">they/them</author-comment>
>>> </contrib>
>>>
>>> Nikos
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/20/20 2:30 AM, Lizzi, Vincent vincent.lizzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
>>>> Hi Mark, Tommie, and Gerrit,
>>>>
>>>> I think that the role element could be used to hold authors' personal
>>>> pronouns with a content-type attribute value to semantically identify
>>>> the text as pronouns.
>>>>
>>>> <contrib contrib-type="author">
>>>>
>>>>       <name>
>>>>
>>>>           <surname>Isobe</surname>
>>>>
>>>>           <given-names>M.</given-names>
>>>>
>>>>       </name>
>>>>
>>>>       <role content-type="pronouns">they/them</role>
>>>>
>>>> </contrib>
>>>>
>>>> If your desired display format is to have the personal pronouns
>>>> displayed after the author's name, e.g. "M. Isobe /(they/them)/", and
>>>> your rendering displays the <role> element immediately following the
>>>> contributor name (as some renderings do) tagging personal pronouns in
>>>> <role> like this might "just work". The same display could be also be
>>>> achieved with the tagged example above and styling applied by the
>>>> rendering (perhaps with CSS).
>>>>
>>>> <role content-type="pronouns"><italic>(they/them)</italic></role>
>>>>
>>>> The <role> element also has the advantage of being able to be repeated
>>>> with different xml:lang attribute values in case personal pronouns
>>>> need to be presented in more than one language.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Vincent
>>>>
>>>> _____________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> *Vincent M. Lizzi*
>>>>
>>>> Head of Information Standards | Taylor & Francis Group
>>>>
>>>> vincent.lizzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:vincent.lizzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Information Classification: General
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, September 18, 2020 4:33 PM
>>>> *To:* jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Cc:* Tommie Usdin <btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [jats-list] Preferred pronouns for authors
>>>>
>>>> Hi Tommie and Mark,
>>>>
>>>> Both approaches seem sensible to me. Maybe use @content-type instead
>>>> of @specific-use on string-name in Mark's variant.
>>>>
>>>> The JATS standing committee might consider adding @pronouns to name
>>>> and string-name, should someone file a request for that. An attribute,
>>>> on the other hand, has the disadvantage that it cannot hold
>>>> translations so well. On the other hand, I haven't seen anyone supply
>>>> translations to their pronouns.
>>>>
>>>> In any case, the recommended practice(s) within the existing
>>>> vocabulary can be included in the tag library documentation, or it can
>>>> be dealt with on the JATS4R level
(https://jats4r.org/authors-and-affiliations).
>>>>
>>>> Gerrit
>>>>
>>>> On 18.09.2020 22:06, B Tommie Usdin btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>   > Hi Mark --
>>>>   >
>>>>   > If you are using Green (archiving) you could use <named-content>
>>>> inside <string-name>:
>>>>   >
>>>>   > <contrib contrib-type="author">
>>>>   > <string-name><given-names>>m</given-names> <surname>Isobe</surname>
>>>>> <named-content content-type="pronouns">they/them</named-content>
>>>>   > </string-name></contrib>
>>>>   >
>>>>   > That's a little awkward, but perhaps less so than a
>>>> name-alternative that contains only the pronouns.
>>>>   >
>>>>   > -- Tommie
>>>>   >
>>>>   >
>>>>   >> On Sep 18, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Mark Doyle doyle@xxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:doyle@xxxxxxx> <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>>   >>
>>>>   >> Hi all,
>>>>   >>
>>>>   >> Our editors would like to allow authors to specify preferred
>>>> pronouns in their manuscripts. Although the initial goal is to provide
>>>> this in a footnote for just the corresponding author, I'd like to tag
>>>> this in a more general way that would allow any author to add this to
>>>> their name. So far the best option I have been able to work out is to
>>>> slightly misuse the <name-alternatives> tagging:
>>>>   >>
>>>>   >> <contrib contrib-type="author">
>>>>   >> <name-alternatives>
>>>>   >> <name>
>>>>   >> <surname>Isobe</surname>
>>>>   >> <given-names>M.</given-names>
>>>>   >> </name>
>>>>   >> <string-name
>>>> specific-use="preferred-pronouns">they/them</string-name>
>>>>   >> </name-alternatives>
>>>>   >> </contrib>
>>>>   >>
>>>>   >> Does anyone have a better suggestion for how to handle this?
>>>>   >>
>>>>   >> Best,
>>>>   >> Mark
>>>>   >>
>>>>   >> Mark Doyle
>>>>   >> American Physical Society
>>>>   >> JATS-List info and archive
>>>>   >> EasyUnsubscribe (by email)
>>>>   >
>>>>   >
>

================================================================
Deborah A Lapeyre              mailto:dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.      http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street         Phone: 301-315-9631 (USA)
Suite 207                        Fax:   301-315-8385
Rockville, MD 20850
----------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: Consultancy for XML, XSLT, and Schematron
================================================================

Current Thread