Subject: [jats-list] AW: preformatted text in BITS 2. From: "denis.maier@xxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 08:19:04 -0000 |
Dear colleagues, May I kindly reiterate this question? Any thoughts about this? Ibm currently leaning towards using `boxed-text` with an appropriate attribute. Anything that speaks against this ? Best, Denis Von: Maier, Denis Christian (UB) Gesendet: Freitag, 4. November 2022 17:14 An: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: preformatted text in BITS 2. Dear colleagues Ibm bit struggling with how a should tag the following type of text: Webre going to produce a catalog of Incunables at our institution, each incunable will end up in its own `book-part` with the `body` looking like: ``` <body> <sec> <p>Impressum gemC$ss Kolophon GemC$ss GW und ISTC gedruckt in der Werkstatt des Andreas Asulanus Foliierungsfehler: Blattzahlen 49-50 und 69-70 ausgelassen, Blattzahlen 120-121 wiederholt, zahlreiche weitere Fehler Signaturformel: abdB9b0, eb8, fB9b0, gb8, hblB9b0, mB9B2, nbzB9b0, [et]b6 Blatt [et]b ist unbedruckt </p> <p content-type="position-3">Venedig: Bernardino Stagnino oder Andreas Asulanus, 20.10.1492</p> <p content-type="position-4">235, das heisst 233 BlC$tter, 1 ungezC$hltes Blatt; 43 cm (2B0)</p> <p content-type="position-5"><ext-link xlink:href=http://inkunabeln.digitale-sammlungen.de/Ausgabe_B-186.html ext-link-type="url">BSB-Ink B-186 </ext-link>; <ext-link xlink:href=http://www.gesamtkatalogderwiegendrucke.de/docs/GW03624.htm ext-link-type="url">GW 03624</ext-link>; <ext-link xlink:href=http://data.cerl.org/istc/ib00236300 ext-link-type="url">ISTC ib00236300</ext-link></p> <p content-type="position-6">233 von 234 BlC$ttern (plus 2 zusC$tzliche), vorgesehene Stellen fC<r Initialen frei gelassen</p> <p content-type="position-7">Halbbezogener Ledereinband auf Kartondeckeln (braun, Kalb, 18./19. Jh.) mit flC$chig eingefC$rbtem Papier (grC<n), Linien-BlindprC$gung sowie Titelschild mit GoldprC$gung auf dem RC<cken</p> <!-- leere Elemente bitte nicht C<bertragen --> <p></p> <p></p> <p content-type="position-10">UnvollstC$ndiges Exemplar: Blatt 128 fehlt</p> <p content-type="position-11">Signatur: <ext-link xlink:href=https://swisscollections.ch/Record/99116802840105511 ext-link-type="url">MUE Inc I 8</ext-link></p> </sec> </body> </book-part> ``` Normal paragraphs are not to problem. We use `@content-type` to distinguish between different types of paragraphs. However the `p` element that starts with `<p>Impressum gemC$ss Kolophon` is bit tricky as this should preserve line breaks when going HTML later. How would you deal with that kind of requirement? Ibve seen there is a `preformat` tag, which would sound like a good fit here. However, the specification says this will typically be rendered in a monospace font, which is not the case here. Another option Ibve considered is using `verse-group` and `verse-line` elements, like so : ``` <verse-group> <verse-line>Impressum gemC$ss Kolophon</verse-line> <verse-line>GemC$ss GW und ISTC gedruckt in der Werkstatt des Andreas Asulanus</verse-line> <verse-line>Foliierungsfehler: Blattzahlen 49-50 und 69-70 ausgelassen, Blattzahlen 120-121 wiederholt, zahlreiche weitere Fehler</verse-line> <verse-line>Signaturformel: abdB9b0, eb8, fB9b0, gb8, hblB9b0, mB9B2, nbzB9b0, [et]b6 </verse-line> <verse-line>Blatt [et]b ist unbedruckt</verse-line> </verse-group> ``` That way you can explicity tag each line, and also you can have proper indentation. I donbt know if itbs just me, but I feel this here looks wrong (content of `preformat` is left-aligned, not indented to where where the tag startes): ``` <preformat>Impressum gemC$ss Kolophon GemC$ss GW und ISTC gedruckt in der Werkstatt des Andreas Asulanus Foliierungsfehler: Blattzahlen 49-50 und 69-70 ausgelassen, Blattzahlen 120-121 wiederholt, zahlreiche weitere Fehler Signaturformel: abdB9b0, eb8, fB9b0, gb8, hblB9b0, mB9B2, nbzB9b0, [et]b6 Blatt [et]b ist unbedruckt </preformat> <p content-type="position-3">Venedig: Bernardino Stagnino oder Andreas Asulanus, 20.10.1492</p> ``` Last option Ibve considered is using `p` elements for the individual lines, and wrapping these in a `boxed-text` container: ``` <boxed-text > <p >Impressum gemC$ss Kolophon</p> <p>GemC$ss GW und ISTC gedruckt in der Werkstatt des Andreas Asulanus</p> <p>Foliierungsfehler: Blattzahlen 49-50 und 69-70 ausgelassen, Blattzahlen 120-121 wiederholt, zahlreiche weitere Fehler</p> <p>Signaturformel: abdB9b0, eb8, fB9b0, gb8, hblB9b0, mB9B2, nbzB9b0, [et]b6 </p> <p>Blatt [et]b ist unbedruckt</p> </boxed-text > ``` Of course, with all three options a proper attribute (`@content-type`, `@preformat-type`) may help to add meaningful semantics. Anyway, sorry for the long post. Is there something Ibm missing? Which option would you choose? Is one of these options completely off the rails? Do you see other options? Best, Denis
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [jats-list] How to best deal wi, Gareth Oakes goakes@ | Thread | [jats-list] AW: preformatted text i, Buehring, Franziska |
Re: [jats-list] How to best deal wi, Gareth Oakes goakes@ | Date | [jats-list] AW: preformatted text i, Buehring, Franziska |
Month |