Subject: Re: [niso-sts] Encoding Bibliography From: "Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx" <niso-sts-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:15:30 -0000 |
Hi Tommie,
Thanks for your answer on this, which I thought made sense when I read it first. Now that Ibm trying to implement this logic however I find myself with the challenge that there is no way to enter text in between references.
In our standards it often happens that the Bibliography is bsplitb into functional sections, see this example:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Litteratur*
For dokumenter som det er gjort normative referanser til i teksten, se punkt 2 /Normative referanser. /
*Norsk Standard*
NS 8405B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Norsk bygge- og anleggskontrakt
NS-EN 536B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Veibyggingsmaskiner b Asfaltblandeanlegg b Sikkerhetskrav
...
*Annen litteratur*
ICAO A14B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B (International Civil Aviation Organization): /Annex 14 - Volume I - Aerodromes design and operations./B Third edition. July 1999**
Statens vegvesen /HC%ndbok 025,/ /Prosesskode 1 - Standard arbeidsbeskrivelse for vegkontrakter. Hovedprosess 1-7./B Vegdirektoratet. Oslo, 2007
...
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
So how would I encode this with using <ref-list>? Should I then create a total of three <ref-lists>, the first one without any references in them to hold the first part, and then two more bchildb <ref-list> elements for the Norsk Standard and Annex literature parts?
I have to be honest, I donbt quite see the usefulness of using <ref-list> directly rather than having a section with type bbiblb and having my <ref-list> elements in there. Obviously since ISO (and presumably CEN) are doing it this way too I would prefer to align, but donbt see how I can accommodate cases like the aboveb& Unless it is possible to change NISO to allow text and other elements between <ref> elements? Is there a reason why this was prohibited in the first place?
Thanks for your continued help, I really appreciate how fast this group always responds!
Have a nice day.
DorothC)e
--------------------------------------------- DorothC)e Stadler
Rathenower Str. 38 10559 Berlin Tel: +49 1525 840 85 93 doro@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:doro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On 27. Sep 2018, at 18:41, Tommie Usdin btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <niso-sts-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:niso-sts-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hello DorothC)e b
It will take this community some time to develop best practices.
It seems to me that the most semantically specific markup available is generally best. Since there is an element (<ref-list>) specific to your use and it is available in the location you want to put the bibliography, I suggest that you should use it.
<sec sec-type=bbiblb> is available for those instances where there are bibliographies in other locations in the document. For example, some very large standards have bibliographies at the end of each major section/chapter, and I have heard that there are some standards that have bibliographies in other places in the body of the text.
b Tommie
On Sep 27, 2018, at 12:34 PM, DorothC)e Stadler doro@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:doro@xxxxxxxxxxx> <niso-sts-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:niso-sts-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a question about how to best encode the Bibliography as part of the back matter.
To me, the most logical thing to do is use <sec> with @sec-type=bbiblb. Now I see in the NISO documentation of <sec> that it should be used as follows:
b" Within the back matter (<back>) to tag material that has not been explicitly named as one of the other back matter components, that is, it is not named as an annex (<app>), an acknowledgment (<ack>), a bibliography (<ref-list>), etc.
I am now confused. Should the bibliography always be encoded using <ref-list>, as it is also currently done by ISO using the ISOSTS? If so, why do we even have an @sec-type=bbiblb?
Any enlightenment would be much appreciated!
Kind regards
DorothC)e
---------------------------------------------
DorothC)e Stadler
Rathenower Str. 38 10559 Berlin Tel: +49 1525 840 85 93 doro@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:doro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
You are subscribed as gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx to NISO STS Discussion by Mulberry Technologies, Inc. <http://www.mulberrytech.com/>
EasyUnsubscribe <-sts-list/225679> (by email <>)
-- Gerrit Imsieke GeschC$ftsfC<hrer / Managing Director le-tex publishing services GmbH Weissenfelser Str. 84, 04229 Leipzig, Germany Phone +49 341 355356 110, Fax +49 341 355356 510 gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx, http://www.le-tex.de
Registergericht / Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Leipzig Registernummer / Registration Number: HRB 24930
GeschC$ftsfC<hrer / Managing Directors: Gerrit Imsieke, Svea Jelonek, Thomas Schmidt ---------------------------------------------- Warum wir dieses Jahr nicht auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse sind: https://www.le-tex.de/de/stellungnahme_buchmesse-2018.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [niso-sts] Encoding Bibliograph, Dorothée Stadler dor | Thread | Re: [niso-sts] Encoding Bibliograph, B Tommie Usdin btusd |
Re: [niso-sts] Encoding Bibliograph, Dorothée Stadler dor | Date | Re: [niso-sts] Encoding Bibliograph, B Tommie Usdin btusd |
Month |