|
Subject: Fw: Splitting XSL From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 10:41:26 +0200 |
Didier PH Martin <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hi Paul,
>
><Document Extract>
>Due to the current organization of XSL there are many "XSL
>implementations" that have nothing to do with formatting. Currently there
>is nothing the W3C can do to discourage these "half-implementations"
>without also discouraging the use of the transformation language as a
>basis for electronic commerce and data interchange. Not only has the W3C
>not discouraged these half implementations, one of them is by an editor
>of the XSL specification and others are by W3C members!
><DocumentExtract>
>
><Reply>
>Many thanks Paul. I agree with the document as is except maybe that last
>sentence of the extract above, which, even if true, may be a little bit -
>how can I say - a bit abrasive. Otherwise, I agree with the document and
you
>can put my signature at the bottom of it.
></Reply>
My feelings exactly. You may add my signature as well.
Share & Enjoy,
Oren Ben-Kiki
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Splitting XSL, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: Splitting XSL, Guy_Murphy |
| re: Defeating the MS patent on styl, John Markor | Date | parent attribute? aaargh, Mattias Konradsson |
| Month |