Re: Venting

Subject: Re: Venting
From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 10:21:45 +0000
You say your not looking to hijack the process, and then start talking
about XSL being based on XTL. How did it suddenly turn that way around?

Listen to what you're saying. You're talking abou the XSL process becomming
an XTL process, with XSL bolted on. It will effect be adervsly as the focus
and intent of the language will change.

Please go look at XQL and hijack that.


xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/05/99 09:31:06 PM

To:   xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc:    (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject:  Re: Venting


There is nothing to worry about because you will have XSL that does
everything you want.  Why should you care if XSL just happens to be based
XTL?  What should you care if XTL has some additional features that you
don't need?
What I don't understand is why you would oppose something that will benefit
great number of people without affecting you negatively?  We are not trying
to hijack the XSL process.  All we are asking is that we share the ride
since we are going the same way.
Don Park

 XSL-List info and archive:

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread