Subject: Re: Venting From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 10:30:49 +0000 |
Hi. Yes I would rather see 100 XTL languages rather than see XSL sullied. You see sir, this is an XSL mailing list. Not XQL, XTL, XLL or any other flavour of language. I am here because I am interested in XSL and it's future, not XTL. I don't care if there is never a sungle XTL language brought into exsitence. Here, on this list, all I care about is XSL. If you want to discuss the future of XTL, please go form an XTL mailing list. I have said why I'm here. Why are you here? People, wake-up, the forum is being hijacked. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/07/99 12:42:53 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Venting > > Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 17:46:08 +0000 > From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Venting > > Some vendors may want an XTL, a generic transformation language, without > formatting. If so *go make one*, please don't hijack XSL as a style > language. It would be better in your mind to have 20 proprietary XTL's, just so XSL isn't sullied? [SNIP] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Venting, Guy_Murphy | Thread | RE: Venting, Didier PH Martin |
Re: Splitting XSL, Guy_Murphy | Date | problem with IE5, paolo de lazzaro |
Month |