Re: Venting

[Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx]

Hi.

Yes I would rather see 100 XTL languages rather than see XSL sullied.

You see sir, this is an XSL mailing list. Not XQL, XTL, XLL or any other
flavour of language. I am here because I am interested in XSL and it's
future, not XTL. I don't care if there is never a sungle XTL language
brought into exsitence. Here, on this list, all I care about is XSL.

If you want to discuss the future of XTL, please go form an XTL mailing
list.

I have said why I'm here. Why are you here?

People, wake-up, the forum is being hijacked.

Cheers
     Guy.





xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/07/99 12:42:53 AM

To:   xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc:    (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject:  Venting




>
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 17:46:08 +0000
> From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Venting
>
> Some vendors may want an XTL, a generic transformation language, without
> formatting. If so *go make one*, please don't hijack XSL as a style
> language.
It would be better in your mind to have 20 proprietary XTL's, just so XSL
isn't
sullied?
[SNIP]





 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list