|
Subject: RE: CSS and XSL From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 12:05:17 -0500 |
Frank Boumphrey wrote:
>
>
> As far as I see it CSS and XSL serve two different clientels. Those who
> merely want to decorate a parse tree and those who want to transform it.
>
>
> XSL and CSS use two different methods to decorate the parse tree.
>
> I
>
>
>
> why not put CSS in XML syntax. Well to retain all the information it would
> not only be more verbose, it would also be more difficult to parse.
Perhaps more verbose, but I will use my XML parser so it is quite easy to
parse.
>
> CSS is a compact, easy to understand, and easy to program style language.
> As written CSS syntax is sparing of resources. Even when one uses
> a built in
> xml parser
>
>
>
>
> body{
> background-color:red;
> color:green;
> }
>
> .emphasis{
> font-weight:bold;
> font-style:italic;
> }
>
> Is not only terser, but technically easier to parse than:
How can this be parsed using an XML parser?
>
> <css-style>
> <css-rule>
> <css-selector type="element">body</css-selector>
> <css-declaration>
>
> <css-property>background-color</css-property>
> <css-value>red</css-value>
> <css-declaration>
>
> <css-declaration>
> <css-property>color</css-property>
> <css-value>green</css-value>
> <css-declaration>
> <css-rule>
>
> <css-rule>
> <css-selector type="class">emphasis</css-selector>
> <css-declaration>
> <css-property>font-weight</css-property>
> <css-value>bold</css-value>
> <css-declaration>
>
> <css-declaration>
> <css-property>font-style</css-property>
> <css-value>italic</css-value>
> <css-declaration>
> <css-rule>
> </css-style>
The verbosity is an artifact of the syntax you define.
why not:
<css:style>
<css:rule select="body" type="element">
<css:property name="background-color" value="red" />
<css:property name="color" value="green" />
</css:rule>
<css:rule select="emphasis" type="class">
<css:property name="font-weight value="bold" />
<css:property name="font-style" value="italic" />
</css:rule>
</css:style>
This is hardly more verbose than CSS itself but is XML, and can be built
via XSL. Same number of lines as your example (assuming you include the
<style> </style> wrapper). I'll race you to parse the two :-)
Jonathan Borden
http://jabr.ne.mediaone.net
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: CSS and XSL, Jelks Cabaniss | Thread | RE: CSS and XSL, Jelks Cabaniss |
| Re: CSS and XSL, Simon St.Laurent | Date | RE: XML/XSL parsers, Borden, Jonathan |
| Month |